A representative of the TCК stated in court that during the examination, the plaintiff did not report any health problems and did not appeal the VVK’s decision in the manner prescribed by law.
Medical examination of conscripts / © TSN.ua
The Lviv District Administrative Court refused to satisfy the claim of a man who demanded to recognize the actions of the territorial center of recruitment and social support as illegal due to the inadequate, in his opinion, conduct of the military medical commission before mobilization.
This is reported by the publication “Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta”.
After being drafted, the man was found to have a tumor formation in his right kidney, which led him to insist on canceling the mobilization decision and conducting a repeated medical examination.
Tumor found after mobilization
The plaintiff claimed that after being brought to the TCК, he was actually forcibly sent to undergo a military medical commission, which, in his opinion, took place without proper medical examination and consideration of his actual health status.
Already after mobilization, on March 1, 2026, the results of a multislice computed tomography revealed a tumor formation in his right kidney. The man believed that the disease existed at the time of the VVK examination in November 2025, but the doctors did not detect it.
TCК: no health complaints
Representatives of the territorial center of recruitment opposed the lawsuit. They emphasized that on November 14, 2025, an ad hoc standing VVK examined the plaintiff and established the diagnosis: “General examination and assessment of persons in the absence of complaints or a diagnosed illness. Healthy.”
Based on the commission’s conclusion, the man was deemed fit for military service and mobilized.
The defendant also noted that during the examination, the plaintiff did not report any health problems and did not appeal the VVK’s decision in the manner prescribed by law.
VVK decision remained valid
During the trial, the court established that the referral for a medical examination was drawn up in accordance with current legislation, and no violations were found during the organization of the military medical commission’s work.
The court noted that only after applying to the court did the plaintiff’s representative file a complaint with the regional VVK, but the case materials did not contain information about the results of its consideration.
At the same time, the commission’s decision on the man’s fitness for military service remained valid and was not canceled or revised.
The court emphasized that issues of the correctness of diagnoses and the application of the Schedule of Diseases fall within the competence of medical specialists, not administrative courts.
The ruling took into account the legal position of the Supreme Court, according to which courts cannot substitute themselves for doctors of military medical commissions and evaluate professional medical conclusions.
It was also noted that the VVK of the region or the Central Military Medical Commission have the authority to verify the legality of decisions of ad hoc commissions, cancel them, or order repeated examinations.
Claim fully rejected
Given that the plaintiff did not complete the procedure for administrative appeal of the VVK’s conclusions, and the decision on his fitness remained valid, the court considered the demands to cancel mobilization and conduct a repeated medical examination unfounded.
Based on the results of the case №380/3112/26, the Lviv District Administrative Court refused to satisfy the claim in full. Court costs will not be reimbursed to the parties, as all claims were dismissed.
Recall, earlier lawyer Oleg Mytsyk stated that errors in the work of military medical commissions often occur in Ukraine, which supposedly lead people with serious health problems to service.
Comments Sort: New Old Popular Send